Which of the following is true regarding the traditional peer review process?

This flashcard is meant to be used for studying, quizzing and learning new information. Many scouting web questions are common questions that are typically seen in the classroom, for homework or on quizzes and tests. Flashcards vary depending on the topic, questions and age group. The cards are meant to be seen as a digital flashcard as they appear double sided, or rather hide the answer giving you the opportunity to think about the question at hand and answer it in your head or on a sheet before revealing the correct answer to yourself or studying partner. Some questions will include multiple choice options to show you the options involved and other questions will just have the questions and corrects answers. Simply reveal the answer when you are ready to check your work. Absolutely no cheating is acceptable.

Which of the following is true regarding the traditional peer review process: The traditional peer review process is a system that allows scientists to share information and conduct reviews on each other’s work. It’s based on the idea that any scientist can bring his or her own expertise to bear on any piece of research and make a decision about whether it’s worth publishing.

Peer review is also used for evaluating grant proposals, choosing textbooks, and more. But there are some important differences between the traditional peer review process and modern scientific practices; let’s look at some of those in detail!

• A: Under double-blind review, the identity of the reviewer is revealed to the author.
• B: Under a single-blind review, the identity of the reviewer is revealed to the author.
• C: Under a single-blind review, the identity of the author is revealed to the reviewer. —-> Correct Answers
• D: Under double-blind peer review, both the authors and reviewers don’t keep their anonymity.

Correct Answer Is: Option C

Section:

The traditional peer review process is time consuming, expensive, inefficient and slow.

Explanation and Takeaway:

Which of the following is true regarding the traditional peer review process: Peer review is a process by which experts in a field evaluate the research of others. It’s not perfect, but it’s still an important aspect of scientific research.

The peer review process has been used for centuries, but it wasn’t until recently that scientists began taking advantage of its strengths as well as its shortcomings.

Conclusion

Which of the following is true regarding the traditional peer review process: There is no doubt that the traditional peer review process is an important tool for the research community. It allows researchers to review each other’s work and ensure that it meets quality standards before publishing in a journal.

However, as more and more journals require authors to submit their manuscripts electronically, there has been growing concern about how well this process works for scientists who work outside of academia or don’t have access to high-speed internet connections.

In light of these developments, we hope our guide will help you decide whether peer review remains an effective way of protecting against the publication of fraudulent or low-quality research articles.”

Related Posts:

A) Under single-blind review, the identity of the reviewer is revealed to the author.
B) Under double-blind review, the identity of the reviewer is revealed to the author.
C) Under single-blind review, the identity of the author is revealed to the reviewer.
D) Under double-blind review, the identity of the author is revealed to the reviewer.

Answer Explanation

The correct answer for the given question is C) Under single-blind review, the identity of the author is revealed to the reviewer.

The traditional method of peer review is single or double blind. The most common type of review is a single blind review, in which reviewers know the identities of authors, but authors do not know the identities of reviewers. The authors and the reviewers cannot know each other’s identities in a double-blind peer review. Most authors believe that double-blind reviews are better and less biased, in principle, than single-blind reviews, but they doubt that true blinding can be achieved.

There is no double-blind peer review for 97% of the journals surveyed by editors-in-chief, editors, and editorial board members. Due to the difficulty of truly masking the content and references, most respondents deemed double blinding unnecessary. The panel believed that double blinding would make the detection of fraud more difficult, and considered the current system satisfactory.

Similarly, You May Also Like:

Which of the following is true regarding the traditional peer review process?

A: Under double-blind review, the identity of the reviewer is revealed to the author.

B: Under a single-blind review, the identity of the reviewer is revealed to the author.

C: Under a single-blind review, the identity of the author is revealed to the reviewer.

D: Under double-blind peer review, both the authors and reviewers don’t keep their anonymity.

Answer:

The correct answer is option C.

Explanation:

The true statement regarding the traditional peer review process is “Under single-blind review, the identity of the author is revealed to the reviewer”.

Peer review:

Peer review is the process of reviewing the work of any author by the expert of the same top check if it is relevant and valid, before publication. Peer reviews are used to maintain and improve the quality and performance of the author’s work.

It is the evaluation of someone’s work written work under the same competition to check the quality of the author. It is a form of self-regulation by the qualified members of the same field.

There are there main types of peer review;

• The double-blind
• The single-blind
• Open review.

Single-blind review:

The single-blind review is a traditional review under which the real identity of the author is revealed to the reviewers, but the author is unaware of the reviewer’s identity.

This type of review is objective because there are minimum pressure and influence of the author on the reviewers.

Under the single-blind review, the identity of the author is disclosed to the reviewer. This review is done professionally in order to control the quality of the work which has to be published. Thus, option C is the correct answer.

I am a digital marketer, accountant and a passionate writer. I love to talk about the subjects such as religion, humanity and SEO.