To cut through the confusion, let's look at the definition of acceleration: the time rate of change of velocity. Whenever velocity changes, there must be a corresponding acceleration. Show
The confusion comes from the difference between velocity in 1-dimension and velocity in multiple dimensions. In one dimension, velocity has a magnitude (e.g. 5 m/s\SI[per-mode=symbol]{5}{\meter\per\second}5 m/s) and a direction (e.g. toward the northeast). However, as the direction can only be toward the left or the right, it isn't possible to smoothly vary the direction of velocity—as is the case in circular motion—we can only have discrete shifts. Such motion isn't usually encountered except during collisions, where few would doubt the existence of significant acceleration. In d>1d \gt 1d>1 dimensions, velocity is a full-fledged vector quantity and its direction can be varied naturally. One such case is uniform circular motion where the direction of velocity varies smoothly as we move about the circle. Despite the constancy of speed, the direction of motion is changing and therefore the time rate of change of velocity is nonzero—which constitutes an acceleration. In what direction does the object accelerate? As its speed is unchanging, the acceleration must be perpendicular to the direction of motion, and thus toward the center of the circle. Its magnitude can be found in a number of ways, and is given by acent=v2/R,\mathbf{a}_\textrm{cent} = v^2/R,acent=v2/R, where RRR is the radius of the circle. Rebuttal: In the case of uniform circular motion, can the magnitude of acceleration be written as equal to the rate of change of speed? See Also
`F_c=(mv^2)/r` Fc is the centripetal force of the circular motion, m is the mass (kg) of the object undergoing the motion, v (m/s) is the linear or tangential velocity of the object and r (m) is the radius of this circular motion. Centripetal force provides the curvature to an object’s circular motion. Its direction is orthogonal (right-angled) to the direction of the object’s motion (velocity). In other words, it is always towards the centre of the circular motion. Centripetal acceleration (which can be calculated by Newton’s second law) is in the same direction as centripetal force. Centripetal force is a non-real forceThis means that centripetal force always caused by a real force. For example:
Relationship between centripetal force, mass, speed and radiusFrom the formula, we can deduce the following:
Effect on centripetal force
Changes in centripetal force
Concept Question 1A car rounds a bend on a road that follows the arc of a circle with radius r. The car has mass m and is travelling at a velocity v. Explain the following situations: (a) Why are drivers advised to slow down during wet weather, specifically when they are making a bend. (b) Assuming the friction between the tyres and the road does not change, describe the path of a car with mass 2m when it rounds the bend at velocity v? (c) A motor cyclist rounds the same bend at velocity 2v. If the mass of the motorcycle is 0.25m, what would be different about the centripetal force acting on the motorcycle compared to that on the car? Concept Question 2HSC Q30 2013 The diagram shows a futuristic space station designed to simulate gravity in a weightless environment.
Concept Questions SolutionsQuestion 1 (a) During wet weather, the kinetic friction between a car's tyres and the ground is reduced. This means the centripetal force acting on the car during its bend is reduced. As a result, velocity needs to decrease to maintain radius of the curvature. (b) Since centripetal force remains constant, the radius of curvature is doubled. This means for a car with mass 2m travelling at the same speed v, it requires a greater distance to complete the bend. (c) As seen above, substituting 0.25m and 2v into the equation `F_c=(mv^2)/r` will yield a magnitude of centripetal force identical to one with mass m and velocity v. This means the centripetal force acting on the motorcycle remains unchanged and so does its radius. Question 2 (a) The rotating motion of the spacecraft exerts normal force (centripetal force) on the astronaut. Due to Newton's third law, the astronaut exerts reaction force on the outer perimeter of the spacecraft. The acceleration resulted from this reaction force simulates gravity. (b) As v increases, the magnitude of centripetal force increases (since radius remains constant). Changes in centripetal force are always proportional to the square of change in velocity. (c) Yes, to maintain gravity, the magnitude of centripetal force cannot be changed. A decrease in radius needs to be compensated by a reduction in velocity v. This means the rotational speed to simulate gravity is lower for smaller space stations. (d) No, the mass of the space station does not affect centripetal force nor acceleration. In addition, the mass of the astronaut does not influence the rotational speed required to achieve 1g of gravitational acceleration. This is because simulated gravity is independent of mass: `a_c=v^2/r`. |