How accurate are first response digital pregnancy tests

. 2011 Aug;49(8):1317-1322.

doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.211.

Affiliations

• PMID: 21812725
• DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.211

The utility of six over-the-counter (home) pregnancy tests

Laurence A Cole. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The home pregnancy market is rapidly evolving. It has moved from detection of pregnancy on the day of missed menstrual bleeding, to detection claims 4 days prior. It is moving from all manual tests to digital tests, with a monitor reading the bands and informing women they are pregnant. A thorough study is needed to investigate the validity of claims and evolving usefulness of devices.

Methods: Studies were proposed to examine the sensitivity and specificity of home tests and their abilities to detect pregnancy. Methods examined the abilities of tests to detect human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), hyperglycosylated hCG, free β-subunit, a mixture of these antigens in 40 individual early pregnancy urines.

Results: Using a mixture of hCG, hyperglycosylated hCG and free β-subunit typical for early pregnancy, the sensitivity of the First Response manual and digital tests was 5.5 mIU/mL, while the sensitivities of the EPT and ClearBlue brand manual and digital tests was 22 mIU/mL. On further evaluation, the First Response manual and digital tests both detected 97% of 120 pregnancies on the day of missed menstrual bleeding. The EPT manual and digital devices detected 54% and 67% of pregnancies, respectively, and the ClearBlue manual and digital devices detected 64% and 54% of pregnancies, respectively.

Conclusions: First Response manual and digital claim >99% detection on the day of missed menses. The results here suggest similar sensitivity for these two tests. The EPT and ClearBlue manual and digital test make similar >99% claims, the data presented here disputes their elevated claim.

Similar articles

• Detection of early pregnancy forms of human chorionic gonadotropin by home pregnancy test devices.

  Butler SA, Khanlian SA, Cole LA. Butler SA, et al. Clin Chem. 2001 Dec;47(12):2131-6. Clin Chem. 2001. PMID: 11719477

• Sensitivity of over-the-counter pregnancy tests: comparison of utility and marketing messages.

  Cole LA, Sutton-Riley JM, Khanlian SA, Borkovskaya M, Rayburn BB, Rayburn WF. Cole LA, et al. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2005 Sep-Oct;45(5):608-15. doi: 10.1331/1544345055001391. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2005. PMID: 16295647

• Comparison of analytical sensitivity and women's interpretation of home pregnancy tests.

  Johnson S, Cushion M, Bond S, Godbert S, Pike J. Johnson S, et al. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Feb;53(3):391-402. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0643. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015. PMID: 25274958

• The hCG assay or pregnancy test.

  Cole LA. Cole LA. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Apr;50(4):617-30. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.808. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012. PMID: 22149742 Review.

• Human chorionic gonadotropin tests.

  Cole LA. Cole LA. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009 Oct;9(7):721-47. doi: 10.1586/erm.09.51. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009. PMID: 19817556 Review.

Cited by

• A multicolor multiplex lateral flow assay for high-sensitivity analyte detection using persistent luminescent nanophosphors.

  Danthanarayana AN, Finley E, Vu B, Kourentzi K, Willson RC, Brgoch J. Danthanarayana AN, et al. Anal Methods. 2020 Jan 21;12(3):272-280. doi: 10.1039/c9ay02247c. Epub 2019 Dec 10. Anal Methods. 2020. PMID: 32577135 Free PMC article.

• Evidence-based pregnancy testing in clinical trials: Recommendations from a multi-stakeholder development process.

  Morse JE, Calvert SB, Jurkowski C, Tassinari M, Sewell CA, Myers ER. Morse JE, et al. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0202474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202474. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30208049 Free PMC article.

• Supposed pituitary-production of human chorionic Gonadotropin induced by androgen deprivation therapy.

  Yoshimura K, Nakashima Y, Sugiyama K, Kohei N, Takizawa A. Yoshimura K, et al. Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jan-Feb;45(1):38-44. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0654. Int Braz J Urol. 2019. PMID: 29757577 Free PMC article.

• Time-Varying Effects of Signs and Symptoms on Pregnancy Loss <20 Weeks: Findings from a Preconception Prospective Cohort Study.

  Sapra KJ, Buck Louis GM, Sundaram R, Joseph KS, Bates LM, Galea S, Ananth CV. Sapra KJ, et al. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;32(1):30-39. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12402. Epub 2017 Aug 25. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29336062 Free PMC article.

• MEDIATION MODELS OF PREGNANCY DESIRES AND UNPLANNED PREGNANCY IN YOUNG, UNMARRIED WOMEN.

  Miller WB, Barber JS, Gatny HH. Miller WB, et al. J Biosoc Sci. 2018 May;50(3):291-311. doi: 10.1017/S0021932017000165. Epub 2017 Jun 5. J Biosoc Sci. 2018. PMID: 28578715 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • De Gruyter
  • Ovid Technologies, Inc.

• Medical

  • Genetic Alliance

Can a Digital First Response pregnancy test be wrong?

How sensitive is the First Response Digital pregnancy test?

What level hCG does First Response Digital detect?

Is First Response Digital more sensitive?