Dense understories of shade-tolerant tree species naturally develop in hardwood forests. Partial cutting practices—for example, select cuts, thinnings, or preparatory harvests for some regeneration practices—can lead to the development of shade-tolerant understory species, including red maple (Acer rubrum), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), and black birch (Betula lenta). In addition, preferential browsing by white-tailed deer favors less-desirable shade-tolerant tree species such as striped maple (Acer pensylvanicum), American beech, and eastern hophornbeam (Ostrya virginiana). These species are increasing in abundance throughout Pennsylvania's forests. Show
Dense understories of undesirable shade-tolerant trees interfere with the establishment and development of desirable regeneration such as northern red oak (Quercus rubra), white oak (Quercus alba), black cherry (Prunus serotina), and yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). Researchers have concluded that species diversity declines as shade-tolerant reproduction continues to expand. Recognizing and treating less-desirable trees prior to a planned harvest increases the proportion of desirable species in the future stand. Removing or deadening undesirable trees is a forest management tool owners can employ to achieve their objectives. It allows the owner to favor species better suited to the site that meet future desired conditions and their objectives. The most effective method for deadening undesirable standing trees involves using an herbicide. Hack-and-squirt, also known as frill and spray, herbicide applications offer one of the most target-specific, efficient, and economical means for controlling unwanted trees. Applications made to undesirable trees facilitate the regeneration or growth of desirable trees in mixed-species stands—for example, oak/hickory or cherry/maple. Hack-and-squirt applications are effective on various size stems and can be used on steep topography and on small ownerships. Hack-and-squirt applications are applicable in hardwood stands where mechanical broadcast spray treatments are not feasible or desirable. What Are Hack-and-Squirt Herbicide Applications?Hack-and-squirt herbicide applications are one of the least expensive manual herbicide application methods. This method introduces the herbicide into the stem using spaced cuts made at a convenient height, below the last live branch, around the trunk. Using a hatchet or similar device, frill cuts, or downward-angled incisions, are made evenly spaced around the stem, one per inch of diameter (two cuts minimum). Frill cuts are approximately 2 inches long and spaced 1 to 2 inches apart. The cuts must penetrate through the bark into the living tissue or sapwood (the outer area of lighter-colored wood in the stem cross-section) and produce a cupping effect to hold the herbicide. Each cut is filled with herbicide using a spray bottle or gunjet herbicide gun attached to a backpack sprayer. Do not overfill. Herbicide that runs out is wasted and might impact nontarget plants. The herbicide solution is often mixed with colorants or dyes, thus allowing the applicator to see treated stems from a distance.
 Hack-and-squirt applications are made by cutting through the bark at a downward angle, making cuplike incisions. Leave intact bark between cuts to facilitate herbicide translocation to roots. Squirt herbicide directly into incisions until full. Photo by David Jackson When Are Hack-and-Squirt Herbicide Applications Most Effective?Hack-and-squirt herbicide applications are effective at any time of the year, except during heavy spring sap flow or severe drought. Research has shown that hack-and-squirt applications made during periods of heavy sap flow are largely ineffective. Do not treat when trees are solidly frozen. When hard freezes are forecasted to occur at night following application, add RV antifreeze (propylene glycol) to the spray solution according to label directions. Note that black birch may have heavy fall sap flow, which will render autumn hack-and-squirt treatments ineffective on this species (see Figure 6). Applications to control root-suckering species such as American beech, black gum, and tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima) are most effective from July to the onset of fall coloration.
Hack-and-squirt applications made with a ground-down bit 1.75 inches wide creates more of a cupping effect to hold herbicide and allows applicator to treat approximately half the circumference of the tree. To achieve this outcome, use the estimated tree diameter as a guide to the number of hacks required (e.g., a 6-inch-diameter tree requires six evenly spaced hacks). Photo by David Jackson What Are Hack-and-Squirt Herbicide Applications Used For?Hack-and-squirt applications are target-specific treatments generally used to control trees that are 1 inch in diameter and greater. Stems less than 1 inch in diameter are too small to treat properly. When encountered, cut or break small stems and spray the stub with herbicide solution. Hack-and-squirt treatments are most commonly used in hardwood forest timber stand improvement projects to deaden undesirable "cull" trees and invasive tree species, such as tree-of-heaven. These applications are often used to help establish desirable regeneration by removing low shade cast by dense understories of undesirable saplings and poles. Hack-and-squirt treatments control competition without impacting existing regeneration or desirable residual trees. It is effective for releasing crop trees in hardwood poletimber stands. In addition, hack-and-squirt can be used to create standing dead trees, called snags, to provide desirable wildlife habitat. Herbicides Labeled for Hack-and-Squirt ApplicationsHerbicides used for hack-and-squirt applications are water-soluble systemic materials, meaning they move vertically and horizontally within the tree. Numerous products have labels for hack-and-squirt applications (Table 1). Table 1. Hack-and-squirt (frill and spray) and injection herbicides.
Applied ResearchThis section shares information from studies conducted by Penn State and the U.S. Forest Service. These studies involve hack-and-squirt herbicide treatments on four problematic species: striped maple, red maple, black birch, and American beech. The objective of these studies was to develop recommendations for time of year, rates, and active ingredients effective at controlling these species. Methods: Controlling Striped Maple, Red Maple, and Black Birch Using Hack-and-Squirt Herbicide ApplicationsThese four studies examined the effectiveness of glyphosate as Accord Concentrate (53.8 percent), Accord XRT II (50.2 percent), and Glypro Plus (41 percent); imazapyr as Polaris AC (53.1 percent) and Arsenal (28.7 percent); and triclopyr as Garlon 3A (44.4 percent) at controlling striped maple, red maple, and black birch using hack-and-squirt applications. For back birch and red maple, hack-and-squirt herbicide applications were made in February, April, June, August, October, and December. For striped maple, hack-and-squirt applications were made only in June and September. Treatments were randomly distributed over the various months. One incision per inch of diameter was made using a hatchet with a bit ground to a 1.75-inch width (see photo of ground-down bit above). A plastic spray bottle was used to dispense the herbicide solution. Herbicide solution was applied to each frill incision until full. Each study site was evaluated one year following treatment. A numerical rating system based on the percentage of the crown controlled—complete control (100 percent) to no control (0 percent)—was used to evaluate treatment effectiveness.
Photo by David Jackson Caution: Herbicides can potentially kill or injure nearby trees through root grafts. Restricting treatments to tree species different from desirable crop trees will minimize this concern. Herbicides containing glyphosate (e.g., Rodeo) and imazapyr (e.g., Arsenal AC) are more prone to movement through functional root grafts than herbicides containing triclopyr (e.g., Garlon 3A and Vastlan). Triclopyr does not translocate well in plants and will not impact nearby trees of the same species. When using herbicides containing the active ingredients imazapyr or glyphosate, recommendations are to leave a 10-foot buffer between crop trees and treated trees of the same species. Striped Maple Control Using Hack-and-Squirt TreatmentsJ. Kochenderfer, U.S. Forest Service This study evaluated the effectiveness of Glypro Plus (41 percent glyphosate) and Arsenal (28.7 percent imazapyr) applied using manual hack-and-squirt applications two times of year, June and September, for controlling (top kill and basal sprouting) striped maple. Herbicide applications were made to frill cuts based on one incision per inch (minimum of two incisions) of diameter measured at breast height (DBH). Location: Central West Virginia
Time of year: Two applications—September 2004 and June 2005 Results and discussion: When applied in June or September the hack-and-squirt treatments controlled 100 percent of the striped maple stems (Figure 1). No basal sprouting was observed on stems treated with Arsenal (imazapyr) (Figure 2). Some basal sprouting occurred on stems treated with Glypro Plus (glyphosate). Basal sprouting was highest on stems treated in June using the lowest concentrations of Glypro Plus. Striped maple treated with glyphosate herbicides is prone to resprouting. These results are consistent with studies on the efficacy of foliar glyphosate applications on striped maple, which found control is lower in June than in late summer. They also observed that lower application rates were more sensitive to application timing. To control striped maple, the 6 percent Arsenal (imazapyr) treatment is recommend—the lower rate reduces application cost and the amount of herbicide used.
Herbicides containing the active ingredient imazapyr are recommended for controlling striped maple and preventing basal sprouting. Photo by Allyson Muth
Figure 2. Striped maple basal sprouting percent. Red Maple Control Using Hack-and-Squirt Treatments (Treating Stems Only)D. Jackson, Penn State This study evaluated the effectiveness of Accord Concentrate (53.8 percent glyphosate), Garlon 3A (44.4 percent triclopyr), and Polaris AC (53.1 percent imazapyr) applied using manual hack-and-squirt for controlling (top kill and basal sprouting) red maple saplings and poles with both dormant and growing-season applications. Herbicide applications were made to frill cuts at the rate of one incision per inch (minimum of two incisions) of diameter measured at DBH. Location: Central Pennsylvania
Time of year: Six applications—June, August, October, and December 2015; February and April 2016 Results and discussion: All hack-and-squirt treatments outside the spring sap-flow window, February to April, resulted in 100 percent top kill of red maple saplings and poles (Figure 3). With the exception of Polaris AC and Polaris AC/Accord Concentrate solutions applied in June (Figure 4), basal sprouting was observed at some level for all other herbicide active ingredients and treatment months. Basal sprouting was highest for applications made during spring sap flow. Basal sprouting remained consistent throughout the remainder of the year for all herbicides studied, ranging from 10 to 50 percent. If basal sprouting is unacceptable, only a very small window is available for treatment. In areas with high deer browse impact this may not be a concern as sprouts will likely experience heavy browsing. If red maple basal sprouting is undesirable, follow-up foliar treatments are likely necessary to achieve full control.
Figure 3: Red maple top kill percent
Figure 4: Red maple basal sprouting percent.
Basal sprouts on top-killed red maple treated with a glyphosate herbicide. Maples are prone to resprouting following hack-and-squirt applications. Photo by David Jackson Red Maple Control Using Hack-and-Squirt Treatments (Treating Stems and Root Flares)This study evaluated the effectiveness of Accord XRT II (50.2 percent glyphosate) and Polaris AC (53.1 percent imazapyr) applied using manual hack-and-squirt applications to stems and root flares for controlling red maple basal sprouting. Herbicide applications were made to frill cuts at the rate of one incision per inch (minimum of two incisions) of diameter measured at DBH as well as to an equal number of frill cuts made to root flares. Location: Central Pennsylvania
Results collected: September 2018 These results are consistent with U.S. Forest Service recommendations for adding a few additional incisions and treating root flares to control difficult species, like red maple. Hack-and-squirting root flares, in addition to the stems, during periods of active growth is effective with both glyphosate and imazapyr herbicides at preventing basal sprouting. Red Maple Control Using Hack-and-Squirt Treatments (Treating Stems and Root Flares)This study evaluated the effectiveness of Accord XRT II (50.2 percent glyphosate) and Polaris AC (53.1 percent imazapyr) applied using manual hack-and-squirt applications to stems and root flares for controlling red maple basal sprouting. Herbicide applications were made to frill cuts at the rate of one incision per inch (minimum of two incisions) of diameter measured at DBH as well as to an equal number of frill cuts made to root flares. Location: Central Pennsylvania
Results collected: September 2018 These results are consistent with U.S. Forest Service recommendations for adding a few additional incisions and treating root flares to control difficult species, like red maple. Hack-and-squirting root flares, in addition to the stems, during periods of active growth is effective with both glyphosate and imazapyr herbicides at preventing basal sprouting.
Figure 5. Red maple basal sprouting percent.
To prevent basal sprouting on difficult-to-control species, such as red maple, black gum, and hickory, treat additional incisions made to root flares as well as the stem. Photo by David Jackson Black Birch Control Using Hack-and-Squirt TreatmentsD. Jackson, Penn State This study evaluated the effectiveness of Accord Conc. (53.8 percent glyphosate), Garlon 3A (44.4 percent triclopyr), and Polaris AC (53.1 percent imazapyr) applied using manual hack-and-squirt applications for controlling black birch with both dormant and growing-season applications. Herbicide applications were made to frill cuts at the rate of one incision per inch (minimum of two incisions) of diameter measured at DBH. Location: Central Pennsylvania
Time of year: Six applications—October and December 2012; February, April, June, and August 2013 Results and discussion: With the exception of two sap-flow periods, April and October, all other times and active ingredients studied provided significant control of black birch saplings and poles (Figure 6). Spring and fall sap flows are especially prevalent in black birch. Hack-and-squirt applications during periods of sap flow are ineffective. The 50 percent Accord Concentrate (glyphosate) solution provided 100 percent control during February, June, August, and December. Limiting application time to periods outside sap-flow windows is extremely effective at controlling black birch. No basal sprouting was observed with any treatments.
Figure 6. Black birch control percent.Figure 6. Black birch control percent.
Black birch is effectively controlled with a 50 percent solution of a concentrated glyphosate herbicide. To be effective, hack-and-squirt applications must occur outside spring and fall sap-flow periods. Photo by David Jackson Methods: Controlling American Beech Using Hack-and-Squirt Herbicide ApplicationsD. Jackson, Penn State The objective was to determine the effectiveness of glyphosate as Rodeo (53.8 percent) and imazapyr as Polaris AC (53.1 per-cent) using manual hack-and-squirt applications for controlling American beech root suckers. All treatments were made on 1/10-acre plots where numerous beech stems of various sizes occurred, from 1 foot tall to large sawtimber. Two herbicides and two diameter treatment limits were evaluated: all trees above 4 inches and all trees above 10 inches in diameter were treated on separate plots using the hack-and-squirt method. Each treatment was replicated four times. A hatchet with a ground-down bit 1.75 inches wide was used to make one incision per inch of DBH. A plastic spray bottle was used to dispense the herbicide solution. Material was sprayed into each frill cut until full. A nested 1/100-acre plot was located at plot center. Within this plot all live beech stems 1 foot tall and less than the treated diameter, 4 inches or 10 inches, were tallied prior to treatment. To summarize results, stem counts were recorded for all beech as follows: over 1 foot to 3 feet, over 3 feet to 6 feet, over 6 feet to 1 inch DBH, and over 1 inch DBH. All plots were evaluated 12 months after treatment. Location: Northcentral Pennsylvania
Two herbicide solutions:
Time of year: Mid-September 2013 Table 2. Overstory beech trees controlled.
*80 percent crown necrosis was considered controlled. The number of root sprouts controlled by hack-and-squirting parent beech trees with herbicides containing the active ingredients glyphosate and imazapyr is significant. This study showed that nearly 60 percent of all beech root sprouts up to 6 feet tall are controlled by treating all parent trees 4 inches in diameter and larger with Rodeo (Table 3). Polaris AC was not as effective as Rodeo, achieving 55 percent control on suckers less than 6 feet tall when treating all parent trees 4 inches in diameter and larger. Table 3. Understory beech sprouts controlled (by percentage).
A large drop in the number of root suckers controlled was observed in the larger size classes (Table 3). Two treatments, Rodeo 4" and Polaris AC 10", controlled no stems greater than 1 inch in diameter. Even the best treatment, Rodeo 10", only achieved 20 percent control of stems greater than 1 inch in diameter. The large dropoff observed is likely explained by the large amount of herbicide required to control the parent tree. Said another way, little herbicide is left to translocate through the root system to control sprouts, especially larger sprouts.
Making beech treatments in the latter half of the growing season, July to the onset of fall coloration, provides for maximum herbicide translocation to roots. Photo by David Jackson These results are comparable to a U.S. Forest Service study conducted by Kochenderfer et al. (2004) where about half of the existing beech sprouts less than 1 inch DBH and approximately 22 percent of the sprouts 1 to 5.9 inches DBH were controlled by hack-and-squirting all parent beech trees 6 inches in diameter and larger with a 50 percent solution of Accord (41.5 percent glyphosate). Considering these results, a general stand prescription for reducing the number of beech sprouts following a harvest is to hack-and-squirt all parent trees down to a given diameter (e.g., 4 inches, 6 inches, or 8 inches). The chosen treatment diameter depends on stand characteristics. The treatment should provide control of approximately 50 percent of the existing beech sprouts less than 1 inch in diameter as well as all treated parent trees. Treated parent trees could be sold and harvested as merchantable timber, provided enough time is given for herbicide translocation (a minimum of 30 days). To provide maximum herbicide translocation to roots, make all beech herbicide treatments in the latter half of the growing season (July to the onset of fall coloration).
Hack-and-squirting beech parent trees with water-soluble herbicides containing the active ingredients glyphosate or imazapyr will control a significant number of sprouts less than 1 inch in diameter. Photo by Dave Jackson. Conclusions and Management ImplicationsHack-and-squirt herbicide applications allow for targeted, selective vegetation control with little danger of off-site and nontarget species damage. They are effective at controlling trees 1 inch in diameter and greater. Hack-and-squirt herbicide applications provide seasonal flexibility, with effective year-round treatments, except for periods of heavy spring sap flow (and fall for black birch). Treatments are most effective June 1 to November 1 and when stems are not frozen. The herbicides reviewed in this publication are nonrestricted in Pennsylvania, meaning forest landowners can purchase these products and apply them to their own properties without certification. Hack-and-squirt treatments effectively control a wide range of species, including striped maple, red maple, black birch, and American beech. Concentrated glyphosate herbicides diluted 50 percent with water are particularly effective at controlling black birch and American beech. Some species, particularly maples, are prone to basal sprouting following hack-and-squirt treatments with glyphosate herbicides. Additional incisions made to root flares are effective at preventing basal sprouting in difficult-to-control species, like red maple. Herbicides containing the active ingredient imazapyr (e.g., Arsenal AC and Polaris AC) are effective at controlling striped maple. Traditional understory treatments of beech and striped maple have used mechanized (skidder-mounted) mist blowers or a combination of mist blowers and basal bark applications. Mist-blower applications are nonselective and treat all understory vegetation. This may be appropriate in some instances where desirable vegetation is absent. For a more selective application, consider hack-and-squirt treatments. Applications made to parent beech trees 6 inches and larger will effectively control about half the existing beech stems less than 1 inch in diameter. Hack-and-squirt herbicide applications offer one of the safest, most efficient, target-specific, and least expensive means of eliminating unwanted tree species. The herbicides used are nonrestricted and control a wide range of common species. The method is applicable for use on steep topography and small ownerships. It provides a flexible tool landowners and managers can use to accomplish a variety of vegetation management objectives over a wide range of forest types. DisclaimerThe active ingredients described in this publication are produced by a variety of manufacturers. Other formulations with identical efficacy may be available. Trade names are used to give specific information. Penn State Extension does not endorse or guarantee any product or recommend one product instead of another that might be similar. Regulations vary by state. Be sure to check with your state regulatory agency before applying any pesticide and always read and follow the label. Prepared by David R. Jackson, forest resources educator, and James C. Finley, professor emeritus of forest resources. |
How to save a tree from herbicide
Related Posts
Copyright © 2024 themosti Inc.
